East London, South Africa, April 15, 2026 — Julius Malema is awaiting sentencing after being convicted on firearm-related charges tied to a 2018 rally, in a case that could carry a lengthy prison term and potentially jeopardize his role in parliament. Prosecutors are seeking a 15-year sentence, while the EFF leader has vowed to fight the ruling through the courts.

​Court case

Malema was found guilty in October 2025 of unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition, discharging a firearm in public, reckless endangerment, and related offences stemming from a rally in Mdantsane during the Economic Freedom Fighters’ fifth anniversary celebration. Video from the event showed him firing a rifle into the air in front of supporters, a clip that later triggered criminal complaints and years of legal proceedings.

The case is now in the pre-sentencing stage, with the magistrate hearing arguments before deciding punishment. The National Prosecuting Authority says the offences are serious and should attract a custodial sentence, while Malema’s defence has pushed back against the idea of imprisonment.

​Political stakes

The sentencing carries major political consequences because Malema leads the Economic Freedom Fighters, one of South Africa’s most prominent opposition parties. Under South African law, a sentence of more than 12 months without the option of a fine can disqualify a person from serving as a member of parliament once appeals are exhausted. That makes the ruling more than a criminal matter; it is also a test of whether one of the country’s most confrontational political figures can keep his place in national politics.

Malema has signaled that he will appeal any harsh sentence, and he has repeatedly framed the case as politically motivated. Supporters have gathered outside court, underscoring the case’s wider political resonance and the loyalty he still commands among EFF backers.

​

Background to the charges

The case dates back to 2018, when the EFF held its fifth anniversary rally in the Eastern Cape. Prosecutors said Malema fired a weapon in a public setting, while his legal team argued the gun was not his and contested the state’s version of events. His co-accused, former bodyguard Adriaan Snyman, was acquitted.

The matter moved slowly through the courts, with a guilty verdict only delivered in 2025 and sentencing delayed into 2026. That long timeline has turned the case into a symbolic fight over accountability, political power, and the boundaries of public conduct by elected leaders.

Wider context

Malema’s legal troubles come amid his broader reputation as one of South Africa’s most polarizing politicians, known for aggressive rhetoric and a confrontational style. The firearm case adds to an already contentious record that has included other legal and political controversies. For his critics, the case reinforces arguments that he acts above the norms expected of public office; for supporters, it is another example of a leader targeted for his politics.