Orban Proposes Strategic Partnership Agreement with Ukraine as Alternative to EU Membership Talks: Bridging the Gap or Blackmailing the Bloc?

Orban Proposes Strategic Partnership Agreement with Ukraine as Alternative to EU Membership Talks: Bridging the Gap or Blackmailing the Bloc?
x

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has proposed a strategic partnership agreement between the European Union (EU) and Ukraine instead of immediately starting membership talks with the country. This suggestion comes ahead of a crucial EU summit where leaders will decide whether to invite Kyiv to begin membership negotiations. Orban believes that signing a strategic partnership agreement would be a more appropriate first step, allowing for closer cooperation and bridging the current gap between the EU and Ukraine.

He emphasized the complexity of the situation and the need to evaluate the potential consequences of Ukraine's membership on the bloc before proceeding with talks. Orban's proposal comes amidst concerns that Hungary would hinder the EU's decision due to its opposition to the current proposal. The Hungarian prime minister has consistently maintained that certain issues must be addressed before initiating membership talks with Ukraine.

Additionally, Orban called for a ceasefire in Ukraine and recommended creating a separate financial fund, beyond the EU budget, to provide additional funds to the country. He suggested that every EU member should contribute to this fund, ensuring that the EU's budget is not overextended. Orban's proposal follows a visit by European Council President Charles Michel to Budapest, aimed at defusing tensions between Hungary and the EU.

The EU has frozen billions of euros in funds for Hungary due to concerns over democratic checks and balances in the country. Critics accuse Orban of using his stance on Ukraine to blackmail the EU into releasing the frozen funds. EU officials have hinted at the possibility of releasing some of the frozen money following positive developments in Hungary's efforts to strengthen the independence of the judiciary.


Next Story
Share it
Top
To Top