- In a significant turn of events, the California Court of Appeal has granted Wade Robson and James Safechuck the opportunity to reopen their sexual molestation lawsuit against the late King of Pop, Michael Jackson.

The court ruled in favor of the accusers, stating that the corporations owned by Jackson, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, could be held accountable for the alleged abuse.

The plaintiffs, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, accuse Michael Jackson of sexually abusing them during their childhood, with Wade alleging a period of seven years and James alleging a period of four years. They further claim that MJJ Productions facilitated and aided in the abuse by implementing policies that allowed Jackson to be alone with children, as well as covering up the crimes.

In a 37-page ruling, the court highlighted the obligation of the businesses to protect the victims from sexual abuse. To succeed in their quest for compensation, Robson and Safechuck must establish in court that Jackson assaulted them and that the corporations were complicit in the alleged abuse.

The decision marks the second time the California appeals court has reinstated the lawsuit, signalling the determination of Robson and Safechuck to seek justice. Their attorney, Vine Finaldi, will continue to support them in their legal battle. The duo gained significant attention after appearing in the HBO documentary "Leaving Neverland," where they detailed the alleged abuse they endured at the hands of the pop icon.

Previously, Robson and Safechuck filed their lawsuits in 2013 but were dismissed due to California's statute of limitations. However, a change in the law in 2020 provided them with another opportunity to pursue legal action. The cases were once again dismissed, with a judge ruling that the corporations had no obligation to protect the victims from Jackson's actions.

The recent decision by the California Court of Appeal stands in direct opposition to the previous ruling, highlighting the corporations' duty to protect children in the face of sexual abuse. The estate of Michael Jackson expressed disappointment with the outcome, maintaining their belief in his innocence and claiming that the allegations were motivated by financial gain.

With the reopening of these lawsuits, Robson and Safechuck aim to shed light on their experiences and hold those responsible accountable. The court's decision sets a precedent that corporate structures do not shield companies from allegations of facilitating abuse. As the legal battle continues, the truth regarding the allegations against one of music's biggest icons will be sought.